An attempt to identify major conflicts between science and religion
Fundamentalist viewpoints responsible for most conflicts (quote Nibley's Before Adam:[quote]The LDS, inheritors of the Christian version of this teaching, are constantly converting statements of limited application to universal or at least sweeping generalities...
The apparently strange and extravagant phenomena described in the scriptures are often correct descriptions of what would have appeared to a person in a particular situation. You and I have never been in those situations.... They were reporting as well as they could what they had seen from a vantage point on which we have never stood.
So with Noah and the ark. From where he was, "the whole earth" was covered with water as far as he could see... But what were conditions in other parts of the world? If Noah knew that, he would not have sent forth messenger birds to explore. [an excellent point!] The flood as he described it is what he saw of it.
Why do Christians insist on calling it the first rainbow, just because it is the first mentioned? Who says that water drops did not refract light until that day? Well, my old Sunday School teacher, for one, used to say it. [He and I must have had the same Sunday School teacher :-)] [end quote] Also quote Sorenson about need of modern scholars to understand the scriptures.)
where did these fundamentalist views come from?
Most conflicts can be resolved by asking what the scriptures are really telling us. Others by realizing that science is still growing (quote discussion about quarks and laws of physics).
Separate articles address some of the major conflicts
Other thoughts:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-