Sperber and Wilson 1988

Reference:

Under construction

Review

Excerpts

'The code model and the inferential model are not incompatible; they can be combined in various ways.... Both the code model and the inferential model can contribute to the study of verbal communication. However, it is usually assumed that one of the two models must provide the right overall framework for the study of communication in general.... Against these reductionist views, we maintain that communication can be achieved in ways which are as different from one another as walking is from plane flight. In particular, communication can be achieved by coding and decoding messages, and it can be achieved by providing evidence for an intended inference. The code model and the inferential model are each adequate to a different mode of communication; hence upgrading either to the status of a general theory of communication is a mistake....We will propose what we hope is an improved inferential model. However, we do not regard this model as the basis for a general theory of communication' (3).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | basis | code | communication | evidence | framework | inference | mode | status | study | theory | verbal |



'It is true that a language is a code which pairs phonetic and semantic representations of sentences and the thoughts actually communicated by utterances. This gap is filled not by more coding, but by inference. Moreover, there is an alternative to the code model of communication. Communication has been described as a process of inferential recognition of the communicator's intentions. We will try to show how this description can be improved and made explanatory' (9).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | code | communication | description | inference | language | recognition |



'It is not legitimate to ignore the differences between the semantic representations of sentences and the thoughts that utterances are used to convey.... The semantic representation of a sentence deals with a sort of common core of meaning shared by every utterance of it.... The grammar can say nothing about how the hearer, using non-linguistic information, determines on a particular occasion what the time of utterance actually is, who the speaker is, which Bill or Betsy the speaker has in mind, etc., and hence which thought is actually being expressed. These aspects of interpretation involve an interaction between linguistic structure and non-linguistic information, only the former being dealt with by the grammar' (9-10).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | grammar | hearer | interaction | interpretation | meaning | mind | representation | sentence | speaker | structure | thought | utterance |



'To substantiate the code model of verbal communication, it would have to be shown that every case of reference assignment can be dealt with by rules which automatically integrate properties of the context with semantic properties of the utterance. It would also have to be shown that disambiguation, the recovery of propositional attitudes, figurative interpretations and implicit import can be handled along similar lines' (12).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | case | code | communication | context | disambiguation | implicit | reference | utterance | verbal |



'We see the mutual-knowledge hypothesis as untenable. We conclude, therefore, that the code theory must be wrong, and that we had better worry about possible alternatives' (21).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | code | hypothesis | theory |



Sperber and Wilson summarize a basic inference model of communication to be that a speaker means something by an utterance when she intends (1) that her utterance will produce a certain response in the audience, (2) that the audience will recognize her intention, and (3) that the audience's recognition of her intention will function as at least part of the reason for the response (21).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | audience | communication | function | inference | intention | reason | recognition | speaker | utterance |



'Purely inferential communication exists' (26).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication |



'We maintain, then, that there are at least two different modes of communication: the coding-decoding mode and the inferential mode' (27).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication | mode |



'The communication process gives rise to shared information' (38).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication |



'Our notion of what is manifest to an individual is clearly weaker than the notion of what is actually known or assumed. A fact can be manifest without being known' (40).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | notion |



'Because "manifest" is weaker than "known" or "assumed", a notion of mutual manifestness can be developed which does not suffer from the same psychological implausibility as "mutual knowledge" or mutual assumptions"' (41).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | knowledge | notion |



'We assume, then, that communication is governed by a less-than-perfect heuristic. On this approach, failures in communication are to be expected: what is mysterious and requires explanation is not failure but success' (45).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication | explanation | heuristic |



'There is a single property -- relevance -- which makes information worth processing for a human being' (47).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | relevance |



'Our claim is that all human beings automatically aim at the most efficient information processing possible' (49).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | claim |



'We will call such behaviour -- behaviour which makes manifest an intention to make something manifest -- ostensive behaviour or simply ostension. Showing someone something is a case of ostension' (49).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | case | intention | ostension |



'The main thesis of this book is that an act of ostension carries a guarantee of relevance, and that this fact -- which we will call the principle of relevance -- makes manifest the intention behind the ostension. We believe that it is this principle of relevance that is needed to make the inferential model of communication explanatory' (50).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | act | communication | intention | ostension | relevance | thesis |



'Ostensive-inferential communication consists in making manifest to an audience one's intention to make manifest a basic layer of information. It can therefore be described in terms of an informative and a communicative intention' (54).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | audience | communication | intention |



'Treating linguistic communication as the model of communication in general has led to theoretical distortions and misperceptions of the data' (55).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication | data |



'The distortions and misperceptions introduced by the explicit communication model are also found in the study of verbal communication itself. Some essential aspects of implicit verbal communication are overlooked. ... What is implicitly conveyed by an utterance is generally much vaguer than what is explicitly expressed, and that when the implicit import of an utterance is explicitly spelled out, it tends to be distorted by the elimination of this often intentional vagueness. The distortion is even greater in the case of metaphor and other figures of speech, whose poetic effects are generally destroyed by being explicitly spelled out' (56).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | case | communication | implicit | metaphor | study | utterance | vagueness | verbal |



'No one has any clear idea how inference might operate over non-propositional objects: say, over images, impressions or emotions.... We see it as a major challenge for any account of human communication to give a precise description and explanation of its vaguer effects. Distinguishing meaning from communication, accepting that something can be communicated without being strictly speaking meant by the communicator or the communicator's behaviour, is a first essential step' (57).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication | description | explanation | idea | inference | meaning |



'We want to suggest that the communicator's informative intention is better described as an intention to modify directly not the thoughts but the cognitive environment of the audience. The actual cognitive effects of a modification of the cognitive environment are only partly predictable' (58).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | audience | intention |



'When the communicator's informative intention involves making a particular assumption strongly manifest, then that assumption is strongly communicated. When the communicator's intention is to marginally increase the manifestness of a wide range of assumptions, then each of them is weakly communicated. There is, of course, a continuum of cases in between. In the case of strong communication, the communicator can have fairly precise expectations about some of the thoughts that the audience will actually entertain. With weaker forms of communication, the communicator cam merely expect to stir the thoughts of the audience in a certain direction. Often, in human interaction, weak communication is found sufficient or even preferable to the stronger forms' (59-60).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | assumption | audience | case | communication | intention | interaction | range |



'One of the advantages of verbal communication is that it gives rise to the strongest possible form of communication; it enables the hearer to pin down to speaker's intentions about the explicit content of her utterance to a single strongly manifest candidate, with no alternative worth considering at all' (60).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication | content | form | hearer | utterance | verbal |



'To communicate by ostension is to produce a certain stimulus with the aim of fulfilling an informative intention, and intending moreover ... to make it mutually manifest to audience and communicator that the communicator has this informative intention' (60-1).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | audience | intention | ostension |



'Mere informing alters the cognitive environment of the audience. Communication alters the mutual cognitive environment of the audience and communicator. Mutual manifestness may be of little cognitive importance, but it is of crucial social importance' (61).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | audience | communication |



'We began this chapter by asking how human beings communicate with one another, Our answer is that they use two quite different modes of communication: coded communication and ostensive-inferential communication. This is how language is used in verbal communication' (63).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | communication | language | verbal |



Last Modified: July-12-96 12:24:3

Reply to randy_radney@sil.org

[A Lexicon of the Humanities | SIL Home Page | Contributions]