Coates and Cameron 1988

Reference:

Women in their speech communities: new perspectives on language and sex. 1988. London: Longman.

Excerpts

Cameron uses the phrase 'closer to the standard' (11).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | phrase | standard |



'Sociolinguistics has dealt, therefore, with the what of sex differences, but has it dealt so well with the why? Do the conventional explanations given in sociolinguistic analysis stand up to scrutiny? That is the question we want to address' (13).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | analysis | sociolinguistics |



Women are often not the most conservative speakers of a language, so notions that they are more conservative than men are not generally valid (14-5).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | language |



'Women use fewer stygmatised forms and more prestige forms in every class; it is no more justified to class this pattern of female usage hypercorrect than it would be to call the usage of the middle class hypercorrect in relation to that of the working class. The notion of women's sensitivity to prestige norms is an explanation that arises from the intrinsic maleness of the norms. Men's behaviour is seen as normal; when women's differs, it has to be explained' (17).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | explanation | hypercorrect | notion | pattern | prestige | relation |



'Daughters need not resemble their fathers, nor wives their husbands' (18).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: |



Coates and Cameron report a study 'which finds social ambition a better predictor than occupation, or even education, of linguistic behaviour' (18).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | education | study |



'Whatever the solution, it can hardly be denied that there is a problem for sociolinguistics in using the traditional model which takes the family as the primary unit of social stratification at a time when our traditional concept of the family ... is breaking down' (19).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | concept | family | problem | sociolinguistics | stratification |



Coates and Cameron quite correctly point out to us that it is not surprising to have men score higher in multiplexity of relationships, given that the criteria are male-biased to begin with (20-1).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | criteria |



'We need a model of difference and not deficit' (21).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | deficit | difference |



Coates and Cameron report that Nichols has found a correlation between occupations of speakers and whether they use Gullah or 'standard English'. After describing that older black women and men of all ages work in jobs which allow them to speak Gullah, while job opportunities for younger women have opened up which require them to speak standard English, 'Nichols claims that in the South Carolina Black community, labour market forces are the single most important factor influencing linguistic choices' (23).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | community | standard |



Coates and Cameron pose the question to us: 'Given differing vernacular norms for the two sexes, what happens to the definition of the speech community as a group with shared linguistic norms'? (24).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | community | definition |



'As always, there is a need for more empirical research. But this must not be done in a framework which assumes that male behaviour and male norms are prototypical' (24).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | empirical | framework | research |



Deuchar seems to assume a single strategy for women everywhere. 'Women tend to produce speech closer to the standard in pronunciation than that of men. The main explanations advanced for this phenomenon are in terms of sociological factors external to language such as status consciousness or solidarity. I shall show that neither of these explanations is entirely satisfactory, but that the phenomenon can be explained in terms of pragmatic, interactional notions internal to language use. The notions I shall make use of are those of face and power as used by Brown and Levinson (1978) in their model of politeness' (27).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | face | language | power | standard | status | strategy |



'We need to ask why they should use markers of status which neither reflect nor determine their real status' (28).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | status |



'Brown and Levinson ... define the notion of face as "the public self-image that every member wants to claim for himself". ... Negative face involves the desire for freedom of action and freedom from imposition, while positive face involves the desire for approval. Power ... means that in an interaction, the speaker can be characterised as relatively more or less powerful than the addressee' (29).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | action | addressee | claim | face | interaction | notion | power | speaker |



'In order to use the notions of face and power to explain women's greater use of standard speech we need four assumptions: 1. participants in an interaction wish to protect their own face; 2. attention to other's face is affected by relative power in relation to other; 3. attention to other's face may involve damage to one's own; 4. women have less relative power than men' (30).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | face | interaction | participants | power | relation | standard |



Duechar claims that the use of standard speech connotes prestige (31).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | prestige | standard |



Edwards claims that her paper will discuss 'the speech of the female participants in the study'. However, because 'it was arranged that the fieldworker should be the same sex as the friendship group' being studied, there is limitation of the observations to same-sex conversations. Nevertheless, Edwards asserts that 'the validity of these findings ... would have been considerably more limited if the variable of sex had not been carefully controlled' (33-8).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | participants | study | validity |



Thomas studied speakers of a Welsh community where [E:] in certain words is beginning to be lost in favor of a shift to [A:]. She observed that women who use the feature more tend to attend a chapel on the end of town where the dialect is more prevalent. Though most of those who retain this feature in their language also live at that end of the community, there are some who do not live in the east end of the town, but attend church there. 'To summarize, use of the [E:] variant is confined to older women, whose social networks are more community-based that those of their male contemporaries and younger villagers of both sexes' (59).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | community | dialect | language | variant |



The perception of women and men as different subcultures is marked. Usually subculture perception involves the use of features that are 'odd' across cultural boundaries. Yet in the case of differences in language use because of sex, men and women often seem to behave in ways that both see as 'quite natural' (65).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | case | language | perception | subculture |



Power > difference, not deficit (66).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | deficit | difference | power |



A single form does not imply a single function (66).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | form | function |



Tag questions are not always weak forms, as R. Lakoff 1973 claims (67).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: |



Rules and understanding may be context specific, but they should not be ad hoc (67).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | context | understanding |



Analysts use observation only techniques (68).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | observation |



Could Wood's study lead to the conclusion that 'floor time' and other language behavior that is often considered 'power' language is not a significant factor in promotions? The woman in higher status does not need to dominate her male subordinate. We could conclude that language dominance is irrelevant to status in the women's behavior (69).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | conclusion | floor | language | power | status | study |



Minimum response said to be agreement in male speech (70).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | agreement |



Relationship, not information, is the goal (70).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: |



There are multiple functions of tag questions (91).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: |



Gender is not the only relevant variable in the speech styles of men and women (91).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | gender |



A female strategy is not just to display condition of subordination to males, but to cope (92).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | condition | strategy |



How is 'typical' known apart from contrast with other kinds of discourse? (95).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | discourse |



Unshared presuppositions not proven (121).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: |



There is an assumption of differences between same-sex and mixed conversations (120-1).

Domains: Under construction |

Key Terms: | assumption |




Last Modified: July-11-96 17:24:24

Reply to randy_radney@sil.org

[A Lexicon of the Humanities | SIL Home Page | Contributions]