Has a discovery been Made?

J Lamper says that a discovery has been made in this investigation - see Schedule of Events. NM believes discovery powers were used without discovery paperwork being raised.

Extract from Schedule of Events:

December 6, 2006 - NM wrote to J Lamper asking if a discovery had been made on this case.

10 January 2007 - J Lamper replied, “I am unable to see where I have referred to discovery.” NM asked her to give a clear yes or no answer and elaborate. In a letter dated 15 February 2007 J Lamper attempts to explain but fails to give specific examples of where a discovery has been made.

22 February 2007 - J Lamper said that discoveries had been made but she was - once again - unable to give pertinent specific examples, stating that the letter she had written should answer all questions. She refused to talk further about the matter.

10 October 2007 - J Lamper admits, “I authorised discovery assessments to be raised and I signed the resulting notices on 6 September 2007.”

JL claimed a discovery had been made and used discovery powers without having made a discovery. This is against the law.

Extract from Telephone conversation

on 22 February 2007 between

J Lamper and NM. The stress in J Lamper’s voice is apparent when she claims that she has made a discovery. Click the play button.