The sole surviving letter written by Henry's
fifth wife helped send her to the block for treason (and adultery)
in her late teens. Addressed to Thomas Culpeper, her cousin and
lover during her marriage to the aging King Henry VIII, the young
Queen of England writes:
Master Culpeper,
I heartily recommend me unto you, praying you to send me word how
that you do. It was showed me that you was sick, the which thing
troubled me very much till such time that I hear from you praying
you to send me word how that you do, for I never longed so much
for a thing as I do to see you and to speak with you...when I think
again that you shall depart from me again it makes my heart die
.... that I cannot be always in your company. It my trust is always
in you that you will be as you have promised me, and in that hope
I trust upon still, praying you that you will come when my Lady
Rochford is here for then I shall be best at leisure to be at your
commandment... thus I take my leave of you, trusting to see you
shortly again and I would you was with me now that you might see
what pain I take in writing to you.
Yours as long as life endures,
Katheryn.
For a queen of England, remarkably little is
known of this last love of Henry's life (his final marriage to Katherine
Parr, his sixth wife, was largely for convenience). Born to the
third son of the famous Howard family (her uncle was Thomas Howard,
Duke of Norfolk, uncle of Anne Boleyn and one of the most wealthy
and powerful peers in England), there is no birth register for Catherine.
Her birth is variously estimated to have occurred anywhere from
1520 to 1525, but is conventionally accepted as 1521, although she
was not mentioned in her father's will made in 1524. In any event,
she was in her mid to late 'teens when she finally met Henry VIII.
The Lesser Nobility
Catherine's father, Lord Edmund Howard, was
the third son of the second Duke of Norfolk and, not being the heir,
was perennially in debt, although he married three well-off women.
Catherine's mother, Jocasta Legh, nee Culpeper, was a wealthy widow.
She died shortly after Catherine's birth, after which Edmund married
twice more, acquiring both natural and numerous stepchildren. Romantic
historians, including the extremely inaccurate Agnes Strickland,
attempt to portray Catherine as having been raised on poverty, illiteracy
and moral neglect. On the contrary, her father, although never in
the King's particular favor, was (due to his family connections)
known to Henry VIII and appeared at Court; he had been given command
of a wing of the English army at the great victory of Flodden Field
in 1513 and later served as Constable of Calais, dying in 1539.
None of his positions, however, were either prominent or particularly
well-paid; he had not caught the King's favor. Howard was also infrequently
in trouble with Henry. He was hauled before Cardinal Wolsey and
the Star Chamber on two occasions for for overbearing or unscrupulous
legal proceedings and for "instigating riots." What is
known about Edmund Howard was that he was always deeply in debt
and forever begging jobs or favors from everyone from the King to
Thomas Cranmer on down, frequently in written notes that complain
of his constant financial debts and embarrassments. This rather
ne'er-do-well son of a famous family did, however, make the best
use of his family connections and the family did not know want,
although there was never as much money available as Howard felt
his station required. One of those connections was to send Catherine,
still a child, to her step-grandmother's to be brought up, a common
practice among the English nobility of the time. The lady in question
happened to be Agnes Howard, the Dowager Duchess of Norfolk, who
lived on her estates at Horsham in Sussex and one of the Howard's
many residences at Lambeth.
The children of English nobles were treated
cooly as negotiable family assets, to be expended wherever family
alliance, wealth, and success required. Catherine was one of dozens
of young girls and boys being trained in the Howard precincts; several
of her siblings were all brought up by the Dowager at various times.
Children were, after all, regularly married in their early teens
- the preferred age was 14, although Catherine's own mother was
first married at twelve, to a man a generation older. The Dowager
ensured that Catherine received a minimal education (she could read
and write, although her spelling was never dependable) and learned
her most important future skill; to manage a large, noble household
full of servants, family, and hangers-on. The fact that the Dowager
Duchess was old, managing a great household with perhaps as many
as 100 residents and servants, and that Catherine slept in dormitory-like
rooms full of other frivolous young daughters of nobility, simply
meant that there was plenty of room for mischief. All the Dowager
apparently asked was that, whatever was going on in the girls' rooms
at night, it not be flaunted in her face.
In 1536, when Catherine was about 14, Henry
Manox was summoned to Horsham to teach the household children how
to place the virginals and the lute. Manox was the son of one of
the Duchess' neighbors and appears to have occupied a position between
a servant and a gentleman in the household. A flirtation ensued
(largely on Manox's part). If later events had not resurrected this
old history, precisely what occurred when Catherine agreed to meet
Manox late one evening in the deserted chapel chambers would be
unimportant; given the fact that the Dowager chanced upon the two
probably suggests that Manox was telling the truth later when he
swore he had not actually gotten as far as to "know her carnally."
The Duchess forbade them to meet again.
Apparently Catherine -who, given her position,
was under no illusions that this was more than a delicious flirtation
- tired of Manox fairly soon, particularly after the Dowager moved
her menagerie household to Norfolk House in Lambeth in 1537. Although
Manox followed (finding a position in a neighboring house), Catherine
was now meeting the far more eligible noble sons and attendants
of her uncle, the Duke, when he visited his stepmother's house.
Thomas Howard was one of Henry VIII's most valuable courtiers, one
of the greatest nobles in England, currently still somewhat under
a cloud after the execution of his other niece, Anne Boleyn. One
of the Duke's household was the extremely handsome, well-bred Francis
Dereham, and Catherine apparently fell for him shortly after her
return to Lambeth. She would be involved with him in ever-increasing
intimacy for the next two years and, by her own admission, became
his mistress no later than 1538 (a problem with dating Catherine's
birth in 1525 is the conceivable, but somewhat unlikely, conclusion
that she would have been 13 at the oldest when when the affair began).
Unfortunately for Catherine, Dereham's secret
late-night visits to the girls' dormitory rooms - by means of secret
signs and notes, and with smuggled bottles of wine and strawberries
- was known to all the other girls who shared it, in an age when
no bedroom was private and noble women usually slept at least two
to a bed. Later, her bedfellows would complain that they were literally
kicked out of Catherine's bed so Dereham could enter it, further
complaining about being kept up late at night by the "puffing
and blowing" going on behind Catherine's closed bed hangings.
Witnesses knew and could speak of the fact that Catherine and Dereham
referred to each other as "husband" and "wife"
(a pre-contract or common-law marriage which, under law, could be
considered binding). The fact that the affair was common knowledge
would later prove deadly.
The Eye of the King
In the fall of 1539, Henry was readying to marry
his fourth wife, after the death of Jane Seymour in childbirth in
late 1537. Anne of Cleves, a German princess, would be surrounded
by the young daughters of the English nobility at the revived Court.
The Duke of Norfolk made sure that there was a place for Howard
daughters among those next to the new Queen, and one of those he
selected was his vivacious, petite, pretty niece. Catherine, by
her own later account, bade a casual farewell to Dereham as she
left Lambeth. Although he had often pressed her for marriage, she
had never considered him as a husband - she was a Howard, after
all. The teenager went blithely to the king's court with the specific
admonitions of her uncle and the Dowager Duchess to catch the lonely
king's eye, if she could.
|
| |
" The girl who appears dimly
through these early years was a bundle of contradictory
passions and desires. She was pretty and giddy, unscrupulous
and passionate, easy to anger but quick to forgive,
capable of intense if mercurial emotions, but always
and acutely aware of her Howard descent and family
obligations. At nineteen, Catherine was probably no
different from other girls of gentle blood whose greatest
ambition was to be maid of honor to the new queen."
|
|
| |
Smith, A Tudor
Tragedy, 61. |
|
|
|
Henry VIII was nearly 50 in an age when men died young. He had
agreed to marry Anne of Cleves on the basis of a flattering portrait
by Holbein and the need to make an alliance with a Protestant nation,
but from the moment she arrived in England in January, 1540, the
king turned from her in repulsion. Anne was far from pretty, as
her portrait had implied; she spoke only German (one of the few
European languages the King did not); she was drab and unexciting
and apparently seldom washed, however worthy her political attachments.
The King himself admitted that the marriage had not been consummated.
Within weeks, Henry was struggling to free himself of Anne; an excuse
for annulment was later found through her pre-contract with another
man. At the same time, he discerned auburn-haired Catherine Howard
among the ladies in waiting to his new Queen. The Howard family
was delighted and admitted later to giving Catherine detailed hints
on how to attract the king. It looked like the disgrace the Howards
had suffered after Anne Boleyn's catastrophic end would be redeemed
at last.

Conventional portrait of Katherine Howard,
Holbein.
By April, 1540, the king was giving Catherine valuable presents;
by early July, with the active cooperation of Anne of Cleves, his
fourth marriage was annulled; on July 28, 1540, the King had married
his new bride, probably between 15-20 years old and thus far younger
than his daughter, Mary. In the whirlwind, Thomas Cromwell, Henry's
extraordinarily important chief minister for a decade who had arranged
the German marriage, lost his head on the same day the king married
his "rose without a thorn."
The Ingenue Queen
Henry appears to have been completely infatuated by Catherine's
youth, vivacious spirits, and (perhaps most important) the illusion
she brought him that he was still virile, an eternal syndrome for
aging males. She was not educated, witty, or politically perceptive;
he didn't care. She loved dancing, laughter, ordering her maids
about, with the wonder of a child who has just discovered that she
owns the world. Rather pathetically, the elderly Henry deluged his
young queen with beautiful clothes and jewels and did his utmost
to keep up with her all-night balls and parties, hunting for hours
as he had in youth, bringing a new, autumnal surge of energy to
his Council and court. Whether he was capable of making love to
Catherine is is unknown, but there are reasons for doubt based both
on the King's increasing weight (he was well over 250 pounds by
this time) and health problems, as well as the fact that Catherine
did not become pregnant. However, he certainly tried, a fact which
would be confirmed later.
The Queen showed almost unbelievable naiveté
in her new position when, in the frantic race to advance the interests
of Howard friends, family and supporters, she actually gave positions
in her own court to four friends (Joan Bulmer, Katherine Tylney,
Alice Restwold and Margaret Morton) from her days in the Horsham
girls' dormitory. All knew and would later speak of her relations
with both Manox and Dereham before her marriage. Her generous carelessness
surpassed belief, however, when in August, 1541, she offered a position
as her private secretary to the lovelorn Francis Dereham. Dereham
came to court and almost immediately began hinting that he had a
special intimacy with the Queen.
The Queen delighted in her ability to bestow patronage. She made
efforts (at her family's behest) to beg mercy from the King for
imprisoned courtiers like Thomas Wyatt. She had new dresses and
jewels almost daily and was at the center of all eyes at Court.
On several occasions, including Christmas, 1541, Henry's ill-assorted
children and Anne of Cleves were brought together at Court. Catherine
specially singled out her young cousin, Elizabeth, insisting that
she be seated honorably near the Queen and treating the child generously.
Edward was too young to remember, Mary too old (she disapproved
of Catherine, although she was polite), but Elizabeth appeared fond
of her gay new "stepmother."
Within months of her marriage, the Queen also discovered a handsome,
ambitious young member of the king's Privy Chamber, Thomas Culpeper
(a distant cousin) who was in his late '20's and had served the
King for some time. Culpeper was of good family - all the young
men who served the aging king in his Privy Chamber were sons of
nobles or upper gentry - and was popular with the king. He probably
knew Catherine from the Dowager Duchess' extended household. Culpeper
appears to have determined to seduce the Queen, by his own later
admission. With the active help of Lady Rochford, one of Catherine's
oldest and most prominent ladies-in-waiting, the two started a clumsy
series of secret assignations in Hampton Court and even during the
Progress of the King and Queen to northern England in the summer
and fall of 1541. Although there is confused testimony about whether
the Queen and Culpeper passed from secret meetings and fondling
to actual infidelity, she met him alone, on multiple occasions,
behind locked bedroom doors and in secret alcoves. On one occasion
they were alone together from midnight to 4 AM. Lady Rochford stood
guard outside the door and testified later that she was sure they
were having sex.
Catherine was showing Culpeper marked favors at Court by spring,
1541, less than eight months after her marriage. She presented him
with private and expensive gifts together with warnings that they
be kept hidden. She warned him to say nothing of their sins in Confession
as the King (who was, after all, head of the Church of England)
might come to hear of it. Rumors were rife among her ladies in waiting,
several of whom could testify the Queen was meeting someone in secret.
Others observed how she treated Culpeper and reached their own conclusions.
Probably sometime in April the Queen composed the letter which
begins this article, later found among Culpeper's papers. In and
of itself, it was quite dangerous enough. Worse was to come. In
October, 1541, a Protestant reformer named Lassells approached the
Archbishop of Canterbury with certain information. H e explained
that his sister, Mary Hall, had been part of the Howard dormitory
crowd at Horsham and Lambeth and had told him Catherine had lovers
there. Cranmer was interested enough to take a statement from Mary
Hall. This alone was enough to suggest further inquiries and discussions
with the Dowager Duchess - who at one point burned Francis Dereham's
letters and papers prior to being interrogated - and the story of
Catherine's purity started unraveling.
Hampton Court Palace (Tudor Wing)
No one privy to the investigations wanted to
alert Henry, who was still deeply fond of his young wife, but Cranmer
finally found the courage to write a letter outlining the facts
of the investigation to date concerning Manox and Dereham, which
he gave to Henry on November 2, 1541. The King could not believe
it, but still ordered further investigation to quench, as he believed,
slanders against his wife. Unfortunately, the more people interviewed,
the more confirmation appeared. Witnesses from the merry days at
Horsham and Lambeth revealed all and hinted at worse. Dereham was
arrested, and Manox. Their initial denials did not survive torture.
As Eustace Chapuys reported to his master, the King of Spain,
"This year on
13 November Sir Thomas Wriothesley, secretary to the king, came
to Hampton Court to the queen, and called all the ladies and gentlewomen
and her servants into the great chamber, and there openly before
them declared certain offenses she had committed in misusing her
body with certain persons before the king's time, because of which
he there discharged all her household; and the morning after she
was taken to Sion, with my Lady Bainton and two other gentlewomen
and certain of her servants to wait on her there until the king's
further pleasure. And various people were taken to the Tower of
London, such as my Lady Rochford, Master Culpepper, one of the king's
privy chamber, and others."
The romantic tale is told that, screaming, Catherine
tried to reach the king in the Royal Chapel at Hampton Court to
try to beg forgiveness, but was taken away by the guards. She never
saw the King again, who moved back to London on November 6.
When Henry was presented in London with written evidence against
Catherine, his rage was terrible but it subsided into the broken
despair and tears of an old man whose illusions have been destroyed.
The boundless sexual energy and flamboyant conceits of his youth
were gone and never returned. His distress and humiliation was evident
to the whole Court. The Spanish ambassador, Chapuys, cynically wrote
his King that Henry grieved more for this queen because he knew
there would not likely be another to follow her.
From November 7, Cranmer and the Duke of Norfolk interrogated Catherine
Howard, who was quite well aware of her danger and almost entirely
hysterical in the days after her detention. Everyone in her family
and the Court distanced themselves from her without compunction.
The Duke, horrified, suggested she be burned alive. The priority
was to save the family and its estates by throwing Catherine to
the wolves of the king's justice; if the Queen was found guilty
of treason, the family estates would be confiscated. The Duke blamed
his stepmother - now imprisoned - and vanished to his country estates
after writing the king penitent letters disowning Catherine.
Catherine was offered one loophole of escape and she was too frightened
and arrogant to take it. She was pressed to confirm Dereham's statement
that he had only slept with her because she had agreed to a pre-contract
in which they had called each other husband and wife. If this were
true, her marriage to the king was invalid from the start because
of the pre-contract and she would, at most, be guilty of bigamy.
Whether from family or personal pride, Catherine denied to the end
that she would contracted with a man of Dereham's modest social
standing. If she had, she could never have legally become Queen.
She did write Henry an abject confession and begged for mercy, admitting
she had permitted Manox to intimately feel her body and that Dereham
had "...used me in such sort as
a man doth his wife many and sundry times, but how often I know
not...although she claimed their affair had only lasted
three months. She excused her errors on the grounds of youth, ignorance,
and weakness, having been talked into it by men of "vicious purpose."
An Queen who had been immoral in her youth could be put aside;
a Queen committing adultery after her marriage would die. During
the early weeks of November, Dereham began by denying any sexual
connection with the Queen; broken, he admitted everything and implicated
Thomas Culpeper as her current lover(he had, after all, been there
at Court, jealously watching). Catherine's letter to the King had,
fatally, sworn that all her errors had occurred before her marriage.
The accused had all been separated by the time Culpeper was arrested
and questioned by Privy councilors. Catherine would soon be moved
with a reduced household to the buildings of a suppressed monastery
at Syon. Additional pressure was placed on the Queen, Culpeper,
and Lady Rochford to confess to adultery. For some time there was
the confusing spectacle of the three energetically exonerating themselves
by blaming the others, the Queen and Culpeper denying while Lady
Rochford accused both and claimed she was an innocent victim of
the Queen's orders. Lady Rochford, unbalanced to begin with, appears
to have actually become delusional during her interrogation and
imprisonment in the Tower.
There was enough to suspect the Queen of adultery, but treason
was brought into the mix by the fact that Culpeper admitted that
he had "intended" to have sex with the Queen. The Queen
was doomed not only for her alleged behavior but because she had
deliberately surrounded herself at court with the "light"
women of her childish escapades, as well as her ex-lover. The seriousness
of Catherine's offense lay in the fact that, by taking a lover,
she could have polluted the true succession of the kings of England
by presenting the king with Culpeper's bastard. By the end of November,
enough evidence had been wrung from the three to ensure their deaths.
Under the standards of the Tudor world, they had risked, blundered,
and been caught: they deserved neither pity nor sympathy, and received
none.
In the Tudor courts, to be accused of crimes by the king's own
ministers automatically suggested a guilty verdict, as it was unthinkable
that innocent persons would ever have been accused in the first
place. There was no question that the trials of those involved could
have any other outcome than affirmation of the King's justice, and
death for the accused. Indeed, Thomas Culpeper's estate was broken
up and distributed before he even attended his "trial."
Both Culpeper and Dereham were arraigned on December 1 and both
were executed on December 10, 1541, at Tyburn. Culpeper, as a gentleman,
was permitted by die by decapitation, but Dereham underwent the
full horror of the traditional traitors' death, hanging, drawing,
and quartering.
Meanwhile, Catherine was publicly declared on November 22 to have
forfeited her honor and was no longer Queen of England. Living at
Syon, Catherine alternated between hysterics and an attempt to act
as if nothing had changed. She appears to have been too stupid or
too terrified to realize the implications of her actions until the
end, and was described during her arrest as being "more
imperious and commanding, and more difficult to please than she
ever was when living with the King, her husband."
She may not have known that, with the exception of the Duke of
Norfolk, her entire immediate family, ladies in waiting, the Dowager
Duchess of Norfolk, and almost anyone who had known her in her misspent
youth was imprisoned in the Tower; in fact, so many were arrested
that additional housing had to be arranged. Although the Howards'
estates were confiscated, most of them were eventually released
and their properties largely reinstated, although the family as
a whole never again found full favor with the King. However, it
required an Act of Parliament to destroy the former queen. Parliament
met in January, 1542, and arrangements were made to try Catherine
in absentia. In addition, a law was quickly passed specifically
making it High Treason for any future woman to marry the king when
not a virgin, which was sardonically noted to reduce the future
number of available candidates.
Catherine and the hysterical Lady Rochford were both attained for
treason in late January and condemned in February.
|
| |
" Catherine is not easy
to judge or to analyze. It may not be accident that
no one seems to have been surprised by the revelation
of her past life except the King, and it may be significant
that no one came to her defense or appears to have
pitied her fate. This is in part a matter of social
ethics and political expediency, for she had placed
herself outside the pale of sympathy. Others of the
King's wives, however, had won passionate avowals
of innocence, and even in the face of the monarch's
wrath men had risked much to express their trust and
love. Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn and Anne of
Cleves all had their champions, but Catherine Howard
had none. It may have been because she was shallow
and brittle, arrogant in success and servile in distress.
"
|
|
| |
Smith, A Tudor
Tragedy, 186. |
|
|
|
On February 10, Catherine joined Lady Rochford at the Tower and,
on Monday, February 12, 1542, they were executed; Catherine had
pulled herself together in the month since Culpeper's death and
intended to die bravely. She confessed all her faults to the Council
and, bizarrely, had the block brought to her prison chamber prior
to the execution so she could practice laying her head upon it.
On the day of her execution, she was so weak she had to be helped
up the scaffold and could barely speak the conventional words of
repentance in which she acknowledged the King's justice in putting
her to death for her crimes. Lady Rochford followed after her, apparently
restored to her senses after a period of insanity. As she had been
instrumental in testifying against her own husband, Lord Rochford
(brother of Anne Boleyn) and sending him to the block in 1536, there
was a savage irony in her death. The scaffold was cleared and the
bodies removed.

Henry VIII, artist unknown, c. 1542
The tragedy of Catherine Howard's life is perhaps the fact that
her death made hardly a ripple in history. Those who wish to portray
her as the tragic victim of injustice forget her vanity and thoughtlessness,
her complete inability to take responsibility for her actions at
any period of her young life. It is distasteful to read the frantic
efforts she made, in the end, to blame everyone else for her predicament.
But in a very real way, she had been a dispensable tool of her family's
pride and arrogance and she was indeed abandoned when she could
no longer serve. Catherine promptly became a "non-person"
and the Tudor world went on with its own affairs, salvaging what
could be saved from the wreck. Perhaps there were only two important
effects of her brief reign and death. One was a king, suddenly elderly,
without illusion, and isolated. One was a child who had seen her
cousin Catherine so awfully mirror her own mother's fate. Robert
Leicester, 30 years later, recalled that Elizabeth Tudor had told
him emphatically that she would never marry when she was only eight
tears old; the year Catherine Howard disappeared.
Sources:
Holbein miniature of Catherine courtesy of The
Six Wives of Henry VIII. Disputed portrait of Catherine Howard
(after Holbein) courtesy of The
Culpeper Family History Site. There is controversy about the
identification of any portrait as that of the King's fifth wife;
the second portrait was identified as authentic but has been recently
questioned. ; this one has been traditionally so identified. The
letters of Katherine Howard are both cited from A Tudor Tragedy
by Lacy Baldwin Smith. The image of Hampton Court Palace (where
Katherine reigned and was arrested) courtesy of The
Arts in Tudor England. Portraits of Thomas Howard, Duke of
Norfolk, and of Henry VIII courtesy of
Tudor and Elizabethan Portraits.
|