"He was as great as a man can be without being moral."
Sir Ronald Syme on Caesar.
It is difficult, now, to separate the most famous Roman of them all
from the most famous author of them all. For twenty generations, the Julius Caesar defined
by Shakespeare has overwhelmed all other images of Caesar, so that it it is difficult to
imagine the living man himself. Yet Shakespeare's Caesar, taken solely as biography, is
deeply flawed. Caesar, however grandiloquent, is also portrayed as corrupted by power:
humorless, pompous, even self-importantly fearful. The needs of a Renaissance playwright
produced an image that likely would have seemed alien to Caesar's contemporaries. There
is no hint of the personal charm for which he was famous, the wit and magnetism remarked
by Cicero and Sulla. Caesar was the cold-eyed conqueror who could tell a defiant subordinate
that it was easier to kill him than to have to say so; the teenage rebel refusing to do
the bidding of the killer-dictator, Sulla; the intellectual second only to Cicero as a
speaker, writer. and student of his age. The man himself was infinitely more complex
and interesting than Shakespeare's version. Perhaps that is why, both because and in
spite of Shakespeare, he is simply the best-recognized Roman in history.
|
| |
"...a man who had become
strongly committed to the popular cause and highly
experienced in the exercise of power, was murdered
in the senate-house by Brutus and Cassius out of jealousy
of his immense power and out of longing for the traditional
constitution. The people in fact missed him more than
they had anyone else; they went round hunting for
his killers, gave him a funeral in the middle of the
forum, built a temple on the site of the pyre, and
still sacrifice to him as a god."
|
|
| |
Appian, I, 4. |
|
|
|
When Caesar died in 44 BC, a great comet soon troubled the skies over
Rome. No more superstitious people ever lived: even those who had bitterly opposed him and
murdered him outside Pompey's Theater were awed by the implications when the heavens themselves
" blazed forth the death of princes." Soon thereafter, for the first time in Roman history,
a living man was deified; in the process, the man himself was lost to history.
In his own lifetime and ever since, Caesar the man - not the god or
the legend - remains inscrutable. Historians ever since have pointed out the difficulty
in reconciling the many and conflicting pictures of the private and public man. The statues,
busts, and coins that have come down to us show similar, confusing faces. Most important of
all is the unanswered, burning question: did Caesar set out to destroy the Roman Republic?
This biography attempts to sketch the significant facts we know about Caesar's life and death.
The interpretation of the facts must be left to each person seeking Caesar.
At no time in Roman history does a man shine in the light of powerful
contemporaries, nor in Roman history is there more source material for their lives and conflicts.
Caesar's life and accomplishments cannot be understood without the context of his fellow-Romans
Cicero ,
Pompey ,
Crassus,
Cato the Younger,
Brutus , and
Antony . The
Gracchi
began the slide to revolution scant decades before Caesar was born;
Sulla and
Marius
helped make the times what they were. Biographies of these men can
be found under Contemporaries.
His military campaigns, including
Alesia, the campaigns of
the the Gallic Wars, the
expeditions to Britain,
and pivotal battles such as those of Pharsalus
and Dyrrhachium, can be found under
"Battles.
Personal notes and thanks may be found in the
Forward. Information about the author may be found
here.
Welcome to Caesar's Rome.

The Roman Forum of the Empire
Bust of Julius Caesar by kind permission of
Forum Romanum.
|