|
When
I was consul the fifth time, I increased the number of patricians
by order of the people and senate. I read the roll of the senate
three times, and in my sixth consulate (28 B.C.E.) I made a census
of the people with Marcus Agrippa as my colleague. I conducted a
lustrum, after a forty-one year gap, in which lustrum were counted
4,063,000 heads of Roman citizens. Then again, with consular imperium
I conducted a lustrum alone when Gaius Censorinus and Gaius Asinius
were consuls (8 B.C.E.), in which lustrum were counted 4,233,000
heads of Roman citizens. And the third time, with consular imperium,
I conducted a lustrum with my son Tiberius Caesar as colleague,
when Sextus Pompeius and Sextus Appuleius were consuls (14 A.C.E.),
in which lustrum were counted 4,937,000 of the heads of Roman citizens.
By new laws passed with my sponsorship, I restored many traditions
of the ancestors, which were falling into disuse in our age, and
myself I handed on precedents of many things to be imitated in later
generations. Res Gesti Divi Augusti,
8.
His rule was personal - and based ultimately
upon a personal oath of allegiance rendered by Rome, Italy and the
West in 32 B.C., subsequently by the other regions of the Empire.
Caesar Augustus possessed indefinite and tremendous resources, open
or secret - all that the principes in the last generation held,
but now stolen from them and enhanced to an exorbitant degree; and
he was Divi filius, destined for consecration in his turn. The plebs
of Rome was Caesar's inherited clientela. He fed them with doles,
amused them with games and claimed to be their protector against
oppression. Free elections returned - that is to say, a grateful
people would unfailingly elect the candidates whom Caesar in his
wisdom had chosen...He controlled all the armies of the Roman people,
in fact Though not in law, and provided from his own pocket the
bounty for the legionaries when they retired from service. Syme, The Roman Revolution, 322.
For months after the deaths of Cleopatra and Antony, Octavian busied
himself in Egypt, administering Rome's newest and, by far, most
wealthiest province after the death of her last Ptolemaean ruler.
He then returned slowly to Rome, traveling through Athens and other
provinces, only to find himself facing for the first time a whole
new type of political challenge.
|
After the destruction of Antony, Octavian ruled supreme.
Yet in the fifteen years since Caesar died, the majority of
his political actions were taken simply to survive, to hold
on to supreme power. He had been promising the restoration
of constitutional government for nearly two decades, but there
were always enemies to be dealt with first - Caesar's assassins,
Sextus Pompeius, Cleopatra, Antony. For perhaps the first
time, Octavian had the opportunity to implement his government
so that those Romans who had survived 20 years of Civil War,
would accept his leadership and not grant him Caesar's own
fate.
It is greatly symbolic that one of Octavian's first actions
upon his return was to dedicate the beautiful temple which
he had begun years before, to the divine Julius Caesar. Built
on the site in the Forum upon which Caesar's body was allegedly
cremated, the Temple of Divine Julius most neatly created
a bookend to Octavian's political career: he had begun it
demanding vengeance against Caesar's murderers, and now they
were all dead - including Antony, by no means a murderer -
and Octavian had the opportunity to implement a whole new
system of government while attempting to avoid his great-uncle's
fate.
Octavian took other wise steps both to reconcile his Roman
power base and to show what care he took for the State:
...Octavian spoke in praise of his subordinates,
and conferred honours upon them as was his custom. To Agrippa,
among other distinctions, he also presented a dark blue flag
to commemorate his naval victory, and to the soldiers he gave
other gifts. The populace was granted four hundred sesterces
each, first to the men of adult age, and later to the children...Octavian
refused to accept from the Italian cities the gold required
to make the triumphal crowns they had voted for him, and meanwhile
not only paid all the debts which he himself owed...but did
not press others to pay their debts to him. Because of these
concessions, the Romans forgot all the hardships they had
suffered and accepted his triumph with pleasure, as though
the enemies he had conquered had all been foreigners. . .
On the occasion of the consecration of the shrine to Julius
Caesar, contests of many kinds took place; the boys of noble
ancestry rode in the equestrian formation which is known as
"Troy"...huge numbers of wild beats and tame animals
were killed and among them were a rhinoceros and a hippopotamus,
which were then seen in Rome for the first time... Cassius
Dio, 21.
|
Temple of Divine Julius |

A reconstruction of a Roman Triumph,
greatest honor the Romans bestowed upon their successful
generals. The actual triumph would stretch for miles as
it traveled, with the general in front and his thousands
of troops behind, to the Temper of Jupiter Optimus Maximus
on the Capitoline Hill. The booty brought back to Rome during
the wars would be prominently displayed on handcarts and
floats. The spoils of Egypt displayed in Octavian's triumph
were spectacular even by the standards of the age and included
- since Cleopatra had killed herself rather than participate
in it - an effigy of the Queen, lying on a couch, and all
her children around her.
|
Then it was time for his Triumph, after
so many years of warfare, largely against other Romans. Few
probably realized, as they helped celebrate this ancient traditional
honor reserved only for the greatest Roman generals, that,
under Augustus, it would become impossible for any Roman not
of the Imperial family to celebrate a Triumph, for soon all
Rome's triumphs would inure to the personal honor of its autocratic
leaders. But those days were yet to come.
In the meantime, Octavian pondered the form
of government now required. Most scholars agree that the plan
for the Roman revolution (as Syme calls it) did not spring
from his forehead, like Athena, ready-armed; instead it was
a careful and sometimes instinctive aggregation of both powers
and personal authority over the next decade, which would leave
Octavian in firm control of the Empire while yet seeming to
be simply the Princeps - the "first among equals"
of his peers.
A remarkable 'debate' in Cassius Dio is
illustrative, not of what Octavian actually did, but what
later generations of Romans believed he had done, in these
critical years. Writing 250 years after the fact, Dio created
a discussion about the means of government in his Augustan
history, in which Octavian's childhood friends, Agrippa and
Maecenas, each took opposing views of what kind of government
was possible in this post-Actium world.
|
CAESAR AUGUSTUS
It must be always remembered that
Octavian had Been acting, at best, semi-legally for two decades,
a fact likely to be noticed in a time of peace. At the same time,
it was unthinkable to go back to the last years of the Republic,
in which one warlord or another had cost the lives of thousands
in their quests for supreme power. So, Caesar is allegedly considering
laying down his powers, now that the threat to Rome is over and
discussed it with his closest associates, Agrippa and Maecenas.
Agrippa spoke nobly for the restoration of the Republic. Maecenas
spoke of the disasters that would befall Rome if Octavian should
try to follow this dangerous course:
|
| |
" ...this freedom, if it
is exercised by men of sound judgment, becomes a source
of great benefit for all, but if exercised by the
misguided, leads to disaster. Accordingly, the man
who grants such a license to the latter is in effect
putting a sword into the hands of a child or a madman;
if he offers it to the wise, he is not only preserving
their other privileges, but saving the incapable even
in spite of themselves...you should look ahead to
the consequences which arise from these, put an end
to the unruly behavior of the populace, and take the
direction of affairs into your own hands and into
those of the other citizens among us who are best
qualified...[you must] take counsel with the best
men in Rome and pass all the appropriate laws without
opposition or protest on the part of the masses; that
any wars should be conducted according to the plans
which you have drawn up; that the rest of the citizens
should obey these orders forthwith; that the choice
of officials should be made by you and your advisers;
and that you and they should also determine honours
and punishments."
|
|
| |
Cassius Dio, Roman
History, Book 52, Chapter 14. |
|
|
|
So well had Augustus laid the foundation for justifying
assumption of total power, than later citizens of the Empire could
see only the dangers, and none of the benefits, of a democratic
state. But still, Octavian proceeded cautiously.
THE SETTLEMENT OF 27 BC
The first great leap forward was taken in a speech
given by Octavian to the Senate on the Ides of January, 27 BC,
when he was Consul for the seventh time, in which he 'gave back'
all of his supra-normal powers to the Senate and people of Rome
and, thus, restored the Republic. Notably, as he remained Consul,
he retained priority powers in terms of governing the Senate.
No authentic version of Octavian's speech survives, but his calculations
were razor-edged. In effect, he offered to give up his powers
(res publica restituta), complaining of exhaustion after
decades of service to Rome, and the Senate then obligingly pleaded
with him to resume all such powers for their own good. A compromise
was then reached, in which Caesar agreed to take over governorship
of the provinces of Gaul, Spain, Syria, Cilicia, Cyprus and Egypt
as his own personal property for ten years, governed using regular
legates chosen by himself. By doing this, Augustus ousted the
powerful proconsular senators who had governed this vital provinces,
thus reducing their ability to develop their own political power
base The Senate would still govern other provinces according to
tradition. A three-day break followed these proposals and the
Senate reconvened with their agreement and the notable proposal
that, symbolizing this new start in Roman history. Octavian a/k/a
Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus, required a new name. The unique
name proposed was "Augustus" . . . a quasi-religious
nomination acknowledging Octavian's supremacy in, and vital importance
to, Rome's future survival.
As a public relations gesture, this was superb theatre,
although almost everyone must have been aware it had all been
proposed, debated, and agreed to beforehand, including the title
(Augustus is said to have considered "Romulus" for his
new designation, but decided against it). But this "Settlement"
laid the groundwork for the image of an Augustus whose sole concern
is the health of Rome and its empire, a theme he would return
to later.
Much is unknown about the details of this settlement,
including just what type of imperium or Senate-given authority
Augustus assumed. The trickiest question is whether, obliquely,
Augustus assumed what the Romans knew as imperium maius,
a power that would permit him to control events in those provinces
not under his direct control, or whether he merely held imperium
proconsulare, the same kind of power any other proconsular
governor retained. Whatever the technicalities (and there is not
enough information to confirm one way or the other), at a stroke
Augustus had appeared to want to step down from his position and
took it back from the hands of a grateful Senate which could not
dispense with him. The settlement, and his proconsular strength,
made him in effect, if not overtly, what he had been for some
time - the ruler of the Roman Empire, all while preserving the
niceties of a modest "first among equals" position.

Map of Rome's Empire at the time of the Settlements
Augustus proceeded in 27 BC to prove his care for
Rome by embarking on a building program, at his own expense, to
improve Rome's infrastructure; he rebuilt the Via Flaminia,
repaired its bridges, and left multiple building projects back
in Rome under the direction of the faithful Agrippa (who had,
himself, begun a thorough overhaul of Rome's aging sewer and water
system). Augustus was obviously busy, as well, with every detail
of Roman government, improving and purifying the coinage, building
Temples to the Gods (his Temple to Apollo on the Palatine was
dedicated in 28). He then took his attractive future son-in-law,
Marcellus, with him to go on campaigns in Gaul and Spain to ensure
peace in those turbulent regions. The ill-health that had haunted
his career once again returned to him; he was incapable of command
at Tarraco and had to conduct the war through subordinates. Meanwhile,
he made arrangements for his teenage daughter, Julia, to marry
Marcellus in the first of many covert moves towards providing
an heir in the event of his own death.
When Augustus returned to Rome at the end of 25,
he held no triumph but agreed to award the same bountiful largesse
to all Roman citizens, thus receiving awards for modesty while
ensuring popular support. Julia and Marcellus were married and
Tiberius, Livia's son by her first marriage, was now also of the
age to be given some responsibility, becoming quaestor in 23 (five
years before the legal age limit). Although Augustus' health was
uncertain, his hold on power had only increased in the four years
since the Settlement. Then, he collapsed and it seemed he would
certainly die.

Capitoleum.org's reconstruction of the Temple of Mars Ultor, vowed
by Augustus after victory at the Battle of Phillipi
THE SETTLEMENT OF 23 BC
Augustus'
illness was serious enough that he gave his signet ring - with
which all documents were signed - to Agrippa and made arrangements
for his co-consul, Piso, to receive top-secret summaries of all
critical administration. Rumors later abounded that he had given
the succession to Agrippa, although Augustus denied it. His recovery
took some time, and in July, 23, Augustus went to the Senate and
gave up the Consulship, source of much of his legitimate power.
This extraordinary
step is also subject of much controversy; some scholars declare
Augustus took the step because of mounting pressure when it seemed
that he intended not only to go on being reelected as Consul indefinitely,
but planned a royal 'succession' for his own family after his
death. Others suggest Augustus struck proactively, before the
Senate could become concerned about either issue. Yet others claim
a scandal led to a would-be rebellion that was quickly hushed
up. Perhaps, simply, his recent health crises and the ambiguity
of who, if anyone, would succeed him if he died, was enough to
upset the Senate and the people, who had no desire to return to
the chaos of the triumvirate with whatever strong man was left
standing.
In any event, it had become politically
dangerous to continue his control through a series of consulships,
hence his resignation. For centuries, to serve as consul of Rome
was the summit of a Roman senator's career and enabled his family
to move into the nobility. Perhaps, in the years of calm, resentments
were resurfacing that Augustus was hogging this position to himself.
Perhaps others had taken note, after a scandal in in 27 BC, that
the son of the great Crassus had been denied the full triumph
for his generalship, an honor now quietly kept by Augustus within
his own family.
Whether in reaction or proaction,
like the settlement of 27, it is almost certain that Augustus
planned his steps carefully in conjunction with Senate contacts
and his own supporters. He had no intention of giving up the power
that went with the consulship, even if he needed to appear to
open that position for others. In return for his sacrificial gesture,
the Senate proposed that, as an individual, he be given proconsular
powers for a period of five years, and was permitted to retain
his imperium even within the city of Rome itself (a long-standing
tradition thus ended). To the people, it appeared that Augustus
received only the same imperium that Senatorial governors
retained and that any concerns for his domination of extraordinary
powers was now over. In reality, Augustus' authority and power
were such that his influence and authority far extended his proconsular
powers. Again, the fiction of his being only another leading Roman
was maintained.
However, the great addition to
Augustus' position came with a second grant from the Senate, of
the tribunicia potestas. The Tribunes of Rome going back
centuries held certain extraordinary powers, but the powers had
never before been divorced from holding the office. The single
most important feature of Tribunician power was the ability to
stop any law in the people's Assembly or the Senate, merely by
interposing a veto. It was also Augustus' guarantee to the Roman
people that he would maintain their rights and powers against
the Senators, acting as the people's watchdog on all laws affecting
their welfare.
The political brilliance of this
move, however it came about, meant that Augustus continued to
successfully balance on the razor-thin line between popular perception
and real power while continuing his aggrandizement. Between the
awards granted him and the powers of the Tribunes; his proconsular
authority in all provinces; his growing auctoritas (a difficult
word, but mainly his political clout as perceived by Rome's leaders);
all gave him in effect supreme power, while at the same time giving
him plausible deniability that he aimed for any such thing.
The settlements of 27 and 23 show
many things about Augustus; that he well understood Rome's hatred
of change, its insecurity after the decades of Civil War, the
growing disinclination of its people to participate in the hard
work of governing an Empire, the frustrated ambitions of its nobles,
and his understanding of how to manipulate those he himself had
raised to leading positions in the Senate. He knew, none better,
how to stage-manage revolution so subtly that it was almost invisible
to the people at large. In effect, although the ride would be
bumpy in the future on one or two occasions, he now held the reins
of Rome's future as the first Roman Emperor. To the end of his
life, he never let them go.
SOURCES: Map
of the Empire by Tony Belmonte. Illustrations and information concerning
the Augustan Forum courtesy of James Grout, Encyclopaedia
Romana. For more images of the Augustan Forum, see the Forum
of Augustus.
 
|