Above: Various colors and textures of novaculite. Credit: USDA Forest Service.
Metaquartzite and novaculite are very fine-grained and were used for lithic tools, and both are gray, tan, brown, and pink, making them sometimes hard to identify. Because both rocks have a very fine texture, differentiating between them macroscopically, or even with a hand lens, is not always possible. I used the electron microprobe to show the mineralogical differences in novaculite and metaquartzite with similar colors and textures.
Below: Is this metaquartzite? Or is it novaculite? Are you sure?
Metaquartzite is a quartz-rich metamorphic rock. The original quartz grains have been fused by heat and pressure, giving the rock a metamorphic micro-texture. It often contains 10% or more of other minerals, including iron oxides, carbonates, and clay minerals. Novaculite, on the other hand, is a micro- or cryptocrystalline sedimentary rock that usually is nearly pure silica -- carbonates, like calcite, have leached out of the material. The backscattered-electron (BSE) images and X-ray element maps below easily show these mineralogical differences.
Below: BSE image, Si map, and Ca map for metaquartzite. The field of view is 500 x 500 microns. The matrix (the yellow/green area in the Si map) is quartz. As we would expect, calcite (the green/blue crystals in the Ca map) occurs within the quartz matrix. The small red dots in the BSE image are iron-manganese oxides.
Below: BSE image, Si map, and Ca map for novaculite. The field of view is 500 x 500 microns. In the BSE image, the blue is mostly quartz, and the green is mostly an aluminum silicate -- some of the contrast is due to the texture. No calcite is present. The red spot in the top left of the BSE image is titanium oxide, probably rutile.
Metaquartzite and novaculite are sometimes hard to distinguish macroscopically, but X-ray microanalysis cannot be fooled by appearances -- their colors and textures can vary highly but not their mineralogy.