Keywords: geophysics, prospection techniques, etymology, roots and prefixes
Various prospection techniques, adapted from geophysical surveying, have been invaluable in archaeology. It is hard to overstate the effects that surveying techniques -- electrical resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and ground-penetrating radar, for instance -- have had on archaeological research and excavation... But I really don't like the word "archaeogeophysics" at all. Sorry. Fortunately, I saw it only once at SAA in Vancouver: there was a poster titled "Archaeogeophysics at Etowah Indian Mounds State Park." Why do I not like this term? First, it sounds too much like a buzzword that is trying too hard to be interdisciplinary. Second, geophysics is a huge field, and most archaeologists only make use of the subsurface exploration methods, so they really should mention "geophysical prospection" or "geophysical surveys." Third, the subfields of geophysics don't follow this naming pattern. There isn't seismogeophysics, geothermogeophysics, or minerogeophysics -- there is just seismology, geothermometry, and mineral physics. Lastly, the word "archaeogeophysics" isn't etymologically correct. "Geo-" means "earth" so "geophysics" means "earth physics," which is an accurate description of the field: study of the earth using various physical methods. Adding "archaeo-," meaning "ancient," would then modify "geophyiscs." Accordingly, the term "archaeogeophysics" should mean "ancient geophyiscs," not the archaeological applications of geophyiscs. This interpretation is consistent with the terms archaeomineralogy and archaeometallurgy. George "Rip" Rapp coined the term "archaeomineralogy" in his book with that title. It isn't a book about using modern mineralogy to address archaeological questions. Instead, it's a book about the uses of and conceptions about minerals in the past, from prehistory until the 17th century. Likewise, "archaeometallurgy" is the study of past metallurgical knowledge and techniques, from ancient to historical times. What alternative do I propose? Either use just "geophysics" (there's nothing wrong with that) or "archaeological geophysics" (which still includes the interdisciplinary focus). Anyway, below is a recent article that uses the term "archaeogeophysics" abundantly...
Above: Stacked data from several prospection techniques (microtopography, magnetic susceptibility, electrical resistivity, and fluxgate gradiometry) of a mound in Ireland. Credit: National University of Ireland.
Excerpts from Mehr News:
Iranian and French Experts Team Up for Archaeogeophysical Studies
A joint team of Iranian and French experts have recently resumed archaeogeophysical studies in Pasargadae in Iran’s southern Fars Province.
The studies, which constitute a new joint endeavor on the part of the Archaeological Research Center of Iran, the Parseh and Pasargadae Research Foundation and France’s Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (National Scientific Research Center, CNRS), aim to make new demarcations for the city of Pasargadae and will also entail in-depth research on the ancient Achaemenid capital.
“These studies are more significant than previous projects,” Iranian team director Kurosh Mohammadkhani told the Persian service of CHN on Saturday.
“In the past research has centered on the buildings used for royal activities, but this joint team plans to survey the areas around the royal structures by using archaeogeophysical methods,” he added.
The team is also scheduled to scrutinize the Achaemenid irrigation system located on the Morghab plain and, in addition, to examine an ancient stone canal linked to a small dam near the village of Shahidabad. The investigation will also verify the materials, which include limestone, used in the main structure of the canal and the type of braces used to hold the sections together, he explained.
It is hoped that the fieldwork will shed light on whether the water barrier is an Achaemenid structure or a relic of subsequent eras. The team also plans to determine precisely how the canal functioned and its original purpose, Mohammadkhani noted. . .
To read the rest of the article, visit the Mehr News website:
These webpages are best viewed with the newest version of your favorite web browser. The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota. Links on these pages to external websites are provided as a convenience, not an endorsement of either views expressed at or products promoted by those sites, so visit them at your own risk. Top photo: sunset over the excavations at Tell Mozan in northeastern Syria, taken by Ellery Frahm.
News articles come from various sources, and the sources are cited in each post. Excerpts from these articles are used under fair use. Use of this copyrighted material has not always been specifically authorized by the owner. The material has made available here in order to advance understanding of geoarchaeology, archaeological science, and related fields. This constitutes "fair use" of copyrighted material as described in section 107 of the US Copyright Law: "the fair use of a copyrighted work... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." This material is distributed without fee or profit to those interested in it for research or educational purposes. This website is not commercial in any way -- it is nonprofit. There is no advertising on this website.
If you believe your work has been used here in a way that constitutes copyright infringement or your intellectual property rights have been otherwise violated, please provide the following information to the site author: 1. a description of the copyrighted work or intellectual property that you claim has been infringed; 2. a description of where that material is located on this site; 3. your address, telephone number, and email address; 4. a statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; 5. a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright or intellectual property owner or authorized to act on the copyright or intellectual property owner's behalf; and 6. your electronic or physical signature.